Drug Testing         My first topic paper is drug testing. Drug

medicate Testing         My first topic paper is drug try oning. drug interrogation is apply in all fields of encounter, from a fast food employee to a professional athlete. Is it chastely justly for companies to break their employees stochastic drug auditions? I think so.

        This could be considered an invasion of loneliness, but it is necessary for companies to be sure that eachone in the company is clean and in a safe on the line of merchandise(p) environment.

        In the profession of sports athletes present suspended all of the cartridge clip when they fail a drug test. The drug scrutiny is dead great that the drug tests be slip awayn at random, that helps sustentation these employees clean and away from the source. If an employee resists to hit a drug test they should be fired. From a source that I rescue ready 40% of young adults entering the work force puddle admitted to using drugs in the past year. One way to get that down is random drug interrogatory. I think that employers birth a moral well(p) to a elegant twenty-four hour periods work in exchange for a fair mean solar days pay. They also have a right to inquire into anything that seriously interferes with an employee rendering a fair days work. It is a well-known fact that drugs can significantly impair a persons work performance, bring down productivity. In fact, drug and alcohol abuse cost employers almost $100 billion in lost productivity each year. Employees who use drugs have double the rate of absenteeism, higher job turnover rates, and cost three times as some(prenominal) in terms of medical benefits as those who dont use drugs, which is a very important and good occasion for the rights of drug testing and make it completely right for the testing to happen. Society has a moral duty to hold dear the health and safety of its citizens.

Drug abuse in the workplace is a dangerous hazard to oneself as well as some others.

        Drug testing also can have a positively charged affect on people who fail the test. How so? easily for instance in the NBA this season, a player failed a random drug test for the 3rd time in 3 seasons. He was of course suspended and forced to go into a rehab clinic for a period of time. If this is used by companies it could bring go forth a positive outcome, because they would have the help they need, and given a second chance they may olfaction re-dedicated to the job and feel that they owe the company, with great results at work with the motivation.

        Of course thither is always opposing sides to the problem. Critics of drug testing argue that the employees have a basic right to their own privacy, and what they do with their person-to-person time is their own business and as long as it does not effect the company. They feel employers cannot intrude on this privacy without serious cause and a reasonable manner. Routine and random drug testing, they claim, clearly violate an employees right to privacy. Their ar much reasons much(prenominal) as these programs, by nature, subject employees to humiliation and lodge in their routinely and randomly, not because not because there is reasonable suspiciousness of drug abuse. Drug testing is not an effective message for screening out employees whose on the job performance is organism impaired by drugs. The results of drug testing only request that traces of a drug are affecting a person at work. In some cases, a drug used days earlier will still register on the test. Most of all, the results of drug tests are notoriously unreliable, a declared fact is that 1000 of every 100,000 samples taken will give erroneous results.

        Drug testing, indeed, presents us with a difficult moral expiration in that how do respect an employers right to a productive and affective workplace, and at the same time protect our rights to privacy?         The companies have a moral right to give these drug tests with the same right anyone should have for any rules or regulations.



First of all, if people have a problem with the drug testing then they have a problem already, because if they refuse or are reluctant to take the test then you assume that they are hiding something and in fact are a drug addict. Second, if they dont indigence to take the drug testing, let them get another job. It is all break dance of the job, like showing up on time, or doing your duties. You are getting paid for the job that you are doing, and the drug tests are a requirement just as any other test, such as a skills test, or an employee evaluation.

                 Furthermore I believe that the drug tests are virtuously right because doing drugs is morally wrong so you cant say the testing is wrong, that would make someone a hypocrite.

As a actor high school athlete I had to go through the random drug testing and I had no issue with the testing. Not to say that the testing had an effect on my select to not do drugs, I think for some others it helped. It unploughed them away from that issue and crowd which helped them out in more than one way. So drug testing can in reality have positive affects on people who would otherwise be in that sort of environment.

        Drug testing is not libellous or intrusive. My final opinion on this issue that drug testing is not morally wrong, because an employer of a company has every right to do what they will within that particular company, and if they want to issue out drug tests and people think that it is not ethically right they have no reason to work at that company and the company would probably be break out off without those people anyway. My contention is that an employer is entitled to drug test on the grounds that the information derived is relevant to confirm the employees capacity to perform according to the terms of employment, and that such testing is a reasonable means of coming to know such information.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper