To determine the ethics that factor into what is known as enquiry Double Bind, one must first be qualified to define it. Interrogation Double Bind is what happens to a witnesser or a victim, when he or she is put on stand. Once a psyche is placed in await of the courtroom, that person becomes a guinea pig. In other words, this person has very little control, if any, and this person is subject to preconceived judgments.Whatever the litigant may say to or ask of this person, the person in the hot seat will come off look hostile, uncooperative, incompetent, or even appear to be lying. This witness neer emerges credible to the court.
Lawyers have many techniques in playing with the courts sense: use of pauses, certain intonations, use of negative and degree words, and so on. For example, in the handout under text edition 2.1, the lawyer asks the witness, wherefore they be not in substantially the same condition, are they? He pauses for 2.5 seconds, which is hardly enough time to answer therefore proceeds to shout, Are they? This makes the witness seem uncooperative delinquent to her hesitance to answer the question. Another example, as seen in Text 2.5 of the same handout, has the lawyer asking the witness is she was attracted to Brian and she replies, I vox populi he was a nice clean-looking man.
The lawyer then asks her again, that this time in another degree, He was attractive-looking right? When she agrees, he then changes the sentence to now say, ...that he was a well-favoured man, which the witness is tricked into agreeing with. Because he changed the severity of the attraction word, the witness in the end looks as if she was attracted to Brian. This did not help her case, considering this was part of...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment