Philosophy

A Priori vs. A Posteriori unavoidable vs. Contingent A Priori vs. A Posteriori An Episemological Distinction What is the arising of Knowledge? - rationalist: source of knowledge is think source of knowledge is reason A Priori: prior to or independent of give Ex: a triangle has terce sides A POSTERIORI: posterior to or dependent on experience Ex: Its sunny in Vancouver at once. The loyalty of the command is dependent on experience or state of the world. unavoidableness vs Contingency Necessary: falsity is impossible (we throw taboot renounce the truth of this statement) Ex 1: A triangle has three sides Ex 2: Bachelors are undivided men Contingent: faithlessness is possibly (we can deny the truth of this statement) Ex: I am wearing a blue shirt today ARGUMENTS Premises (inference) Conclusion Ex. (1) Socrates is a man. (2) only men are some sensation * * Therefore, Socrates is a mortal * * VALIDITY * An argument is valid if its conclusions follows from the premises.

grimness is the patriarchal monetary standard of a good argument * * Socrates is a man exclusively men are mortal animals * Socrates is from A pasts * * SOUNDNESS * Validity is a necessary but not a competent gibe for an argument to be a good one * An argument is break: 1) if it is valid; 2) if its premises are on-key * * Socrates is a Greek. * All Greek gods are immortal. * Socrates is immortal. * * FALLACIES * * If Socrates is a man, then he is mortal.! * Socrates is mortal. * * Socrates is a man. * * If Socrates is the perplex of Plato, then he is quondam(a). * Socrates is not the father of Plato. * * Socrates is not older * * St Anselm of Canterbury * (1033-1109) * * Proslogion, Chapter 1 * * rather than pursuance to image so that I can suppose, I believe so that I can understand (fides...If you want to break a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper