Hamlet Thesis

vill jump on Thesis Statement In the tinker small t avow, William Shakespe atomic number 18 writes of a tragedy in which hamlet and Laertes both face the same problem-a carry off return. The paths of revenge that each of them take, parallel their characters and personalities passim the play. While crossroads broods over the demise penalty of his find for the majority of the play, Laertes takes neighboring(a) action, and upon consultation about the termination of his puzzle, he rushes in and is ready to shoot Claudius-whom he suspects has put to deathed his commence. When they archetypal hear the news of their fathers death, small town and Laertes react in rattling different tracks.When settlement hears that Claudius was the one who killed his father, his immediate reaction was heartache. This is no surprise, due to the detail that he was stillness mourning the death of his father, although everyone else had already gotten over it. In feature, approximately people thought that he was overdoing it ,and Claudius went so far as to tell him that he should get over it, and Yet so far hath discretion fought boardh nature that we with wisest sorrow pretend on him together with memorialization of ourselves (act one, scene two).The way that hamlet send offs his revenge, is to a greater extent intelligent than the way Laertes send offs his. While crossroads is a more intellectual person, as we can keep an eye on from his quick wit and sarcasm, Laertes is more willing and acts, then thinks as we can see when he says I am justly killed with mine own treachery (act five, scene two). In such(prenominal) a oceant, had the play non stop the way it did, critical point may fuddle been more successful in avenging his fathers murder because of his responsibility and intellect.Despite the fact that critical point procrastinates, hamlet was smarter in the way he course of studyned his revenge because his procrastination was due to his grie f and foresight. Although Laertes trait of acting quickly can be prize and gets the job done, in a situation that involves death and vengeance, strategy and discretion are a must. From the beginning of the play, we can see that settlement is an intellectual thinker. Although he believes the hint and pronounces that it is an honest tinge (act one, scene five) , he still takes precautions aft(prenominal) he promises the ghost that he will take revenge.However, crossroads is still a little circumspect of the ghost and therefor decides to feign furiousness so that he would be capable to find out if Claudius was the true slayer of his father. Even while feigning cult Hamlet thinks about the whole service of the madness. Unlike Laertes, Hamlet is careful non to disclose what the ghost has told him and only imparts to Horatio and Marcellus what happened when they depose on his sword that they would never pronounce of what they saw from that point on.One of the reasons why Ham let is such a procrastinator is because he becomes caught up in the details and emf consequences. In the soliloquy of to be or non to be (act three, scene two) Hamlet loses the will to live and ponders whether it is worth it to exist. due(p) to the fact that Hamlet suffered the death of his father at a young age as headspring as well as many other hardships, Hamlet contemplates whether Tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of usurious fortune, or to take arms against the sea of troubles and by opposing, end them?To die to repose no more (act three, scene two). However, later that, Hamlet mentions the potential consequences of the unk presentlyn after death. Due to the death of his father and his induces hasty remarriage which Hamlet does not approve of, Hamlet is well alert of the consequences of his actions and therefore is hesitant to act rashly. When mean his revenge, Hamlet does not jump to conclusions. When the players come, Hamlet asks them to perfor m The Mousetrap-a play of a murder similar to that of Hamlets fathers.Hamlet hopes that The plays the thing wherein Ill mother the conscience of the king (act two, scene two). Indeed, the plan worked and when Claudius stormed out of the theatre, all of Hamlets suspicions were confirmed. As Hamlet so eloquently noted, What, frightened with delusive fire? , (act three, scene two) Hamlet was now positive that Claudius was at fault for murdering his father. some other thing that slows Hamlet down in his plan of revenge is that he is a religious catholic, and he is very interested about mortality rate.Hamlet is scared that if he kills Claudius, his fathers murderer, his soul will be damned. Hamlet is also scared that if he kills Claudius while he is praying, Claudius will go to heaven and that would not please Hamlet because he said that A villain kills my father, and, for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven (act three, scene three). reprobate to Hamlet, Lae rtes followed the passion in his heart. As concisely as he returned from France and perceive the news, he invaded the palace, and then asked the questions- the complete opposite of Hamlet.When Laertes hears that Hamlet killed his father, he expresses intense anger and openly announces his plan to take revenge. In his rage, Laertes yells that allow what comes come, only Ill be revenged just about thoroughly for my father (act four, scene five) and makes up his mind to take revenge no matter how or where. When Hamlet heard that his father had been murdered by Claudius, he had already been grieving his fathers death for a while and although the torture was still fresh, his fathers death was old news to him.Therefore, Hamlet was still able to think rationally and plan his revenge in a more intelligent manner. However, when Laertes heard about his fathers murder, he was so grief stricken that he could not think rationally and just followed what his heart told him- to kill Hamlet. Un like Hamlet, Laertes has no problem to chuck out his throat i th church (Act four, scene seven). To Laertes, mortality doesnt mean alot, as he so bluntly puts it- Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit I dare damnation. (Act four, scene five) Due to his impulsive nature, Laertes tends to be unstable at times.However, Claudius, who suspects Hamlets foreign behavior, joins forces with Laertes to devise a plan to kill Hamlet. This proves a weakness of Laertes- being ineffective to carry out his plans singlehandedly. Together, they scheme to kill Hamlet and even come up with a backup plan in case the first one does not go as planned. In the end, his plan of using a poisoned sword backfires when Hamlet ends up using the poisoned sword on him. When weighing in the pros and cons of each of their personalities and flaws, Hamlet took the smarter route in avenging his fathers murder.Although both Hamlet and Laertes die at the end of the play, the reason Hamlet kills himself is becau se he had nobody to live for. Ophelia, the love of his bread and butter was dead, his father was dead and Claudius had died. Since he had nothing to live for, he chose the option of death. On the other hand, Laertes had no choice in the matter because his plan backfired on him and killed him, as we see at the end. Hamlets patience nonrecreational off because he, Hamlet achieved his goal, and Laertes, the son of a fishmonger, did not.