Religion :: essays research papers

Genetic EngineeringGenes, or chromosomes, are often referred to as "blueprints" which are passed down from generation to generation. From the study of these hereditary materials, scientists fuddle ventured into the recent, and instead controversial, field of familial engineering knowledge. It is described as the "artificial modification of the genetic code of a living organism", and involves the "manipulation and alteration of inwrought characteristics" by humans.Like many some other issues, genetic engineering has sparked a heated debate. Some people believe that it has the potential to become the peeled "miracle tool" of treat."Advances in the field of genetic engineeringcould mean cash advance on an unprecedented scale for all civilization"- Gail DuttonTo others, this new technology borders on the realm of immorality, and is an omen of the danger to come. They are firmly persuade that this human intervention into nature is unethi cal, and will bring about the decease of mankind." the promise of genetic engineering as a tool of medicine is matched onlyby the threat it would pose to human society and civilization."- Ann E. Weissspeedy advances in medical recognition have fuelled the question of bioethics. However, as science takes leaps and bounds towards its goals, ethics are often just learning how to crawl. In fact, it has even suffered major backslides in some cases. Genetic engineering "raises proficient ethical questions about the right of human beings to alter life on the planet". Changing the basic physical traits of an organism can require to an unprecedented threat to life on the planet". With such dreaded consequences, where do we draw the line?What View Does Science Have on Genetic Engineering?For the first time in history, evolution has interpreted a backseat to the meddling of humankind with their own genetic makeup. There is an " current realization that humanity is capable of directly shaping its own and other species evolution".As we ease into the twenty-first century, we realize that genetic engineering is undoubtedly going to have a dramatic effect on our lives. It seems that "with genetic engineering, science has moved from exploring the natural world and its mechanisms to redesigning it." Now, we must remove ourselves this, will that influence be for better, or for worse?However, even the responses of science differ in this topic. Scientists remain divided in their opinions. Some have warned against the hazards of genetic engineering, while others have dismissed these perils as inconsequential. Two argue viewpoints, which is right?