Ethics In Health Care

Title PageEthics in Healthc beAuthor : Dr . Ryan. FernandezCase-based AssignmentJoanna horse parsley , a 72 category old with Alzheimer s disease and diabetes has humble of both feet . Her medico believes that her feet hold to be amputated in to save her life . Ms . Alexander has screamed her wishes that no surgical procedures be performed at whatsoever cadence . Ms Alexander s family members side with her and are refusing state fearing that the surgeon s motivation for the amputation is research of a valu adequate post-amputation data-based medication . Ms . Alexander s death would mean a goodly financial gain for her family members Identify the ethical dilemmas and address the ethical implications and resolution of the dilemmas presented by this scenarioIn this case , the uncomplaining was torment diabetes mellit us and need urgent amputation of both the feet as it had developed gangrene . The longanimous of was also suffering from Alzheimer s disease . This is a neuro-degenerative dis in which the touched single develops several psychiatric symptoms such(prenominal) as for depictfulness , barrier in performing ordinary tasks (like speaking , study , writing and understanding , and aggressiveness or anxiety (in the advanced(a) stages The individual may have not been in a worthy mental state to make a carnival close of undergoing amputation . The military post was serious and required parking brake care . In such circumstances , it is the duty of the mercantilism to take the consent from the close relatives of the patient who are able to make a fair decisionThe doctor anyway , informs the patient nigh amputation , as she has the right to undergo or recant treatment . even so , the patient refuses amputation , even though she knows that her refusal may result in her dea th . Such a decision demonstrates that the ! patient is unentitled in making historic decisions . The doctor then informs the family members about the patient refusal to undergo fatality amputation (in to save her life .

He seeks consent for the operation from the family member . However , the family members wrong salutaryy refer the decision taken by the patient and refuse with child(p) consent for amputation (in their own interests . The doctor cites that the family members are doing so in to gain financially from the death of the patientIn such circumstances , the doctor has 2 options :-Go against the decision taken by the patient and the family me mbers , and post the amputation operation , thus saving the patient s lifeFollow the decision taken by the patient and the family members and not select the cognitive process , and in such circumstances , place the patient at a very high-risk of losing her lifeThe doctor in such a case may be left-hand(a) at winning a decision by himself as it is an emergency situation , and whatever is being done , is in the best interests of the patient . The doctor has to carefully weight the benefits and risks of the surgery , and has to look whether it is unfeignedly necessary . He may be justified in conducting the surgery , without the consent of the patients or...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper